https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955394
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to zm627 from comment #7) > Thank you Neal! > > However I'm a little confused with the -libs subpackage. Would you like to > provide more information about it? > > What I got from your comment is that it's better to split the two .so files > into two packages. The main package contains the .so.1.0.4 and the -libs > package contains the .so.1 (version number is an example here based on the > current upstream release version). > Finally we should have totally 3 packages, the main package which is qatzip > with .so.1.0.4, the -libs package qatzip-libs with .so.1, and the devel > package qatzip-devel with .so. > The libs subpackage should have dependency on the main package. > > Would you like to correct me if I'm wrong? Thanks! Basically, it should look like this: %package libs Summary: Libraries for the qatzip package %description libs This package contains libraries for applications to use the QATzip APIs. %files libs %{_libdir}/libqatzip.so.%{libqatzip_soversion} %{_libdir}/libqatzip.so.%{version} Additionally, the main and devel packages should have a dependency on the libs package, like so: Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
