https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955985
Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> --- Taking this review. Some initial issues: Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ - Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch - Package contains Requires: ruby(release). - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file MIT-LICENSE is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Installation errors ------------------- Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libyajl.so.2()(x86-64) needed by rubygem-ffi-yajl-2.4.0-1.fc35.x86_64 Is libyajl being reviewed? It should probably be marked as a blocker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
