Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666301

Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> 2010-12-30 01:58:59 
EST ---
MUSTFIX:

* /usr/bin/liblas-config is not multilib ready.
This script contains hard-coded references to architecture-specific paths
=> the *-devel.i686 package and the *-devel.x86_64 package can not be installed
in parallel.

One common work-around to such issues is replacing such *-config scripts by
pkg-config files and reimplementing the *-config script as a wrapper around
pkg-config.


* /usr/bin/liblas-config is broken:

e.g.:
a) /usr/bin/liblas-config --libs
-L/usr/lib -llas -llas_c -L/usr/lib64
optimized;/usr/lib64/libboost_program_options-mt.so;debug;/usr/lib64/libboost_program_options-mt.so
/usr/lib64/libgeotiff.so /usr/lib64/libtiff.so /usr/lib64/libxml2.so

Note:
  + -L/usr/lib (on x86_64).
  + optimized;...;debug;...

b) /usr/bin/liblas-config --cflags
-I/usr/include
/usr/bin/liblas-config --includes
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include/libgeotiff -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/libxml2

Using -I/usr/include disturbs the system include path and is never right.

c) /usr/bin/liblas-config --cxxflags
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -pedantic -ansi -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wfloat-equal -Wredundant-decls
-Wno-long-long -std=c++98

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to