Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592645

--- Comment #25 from Bruce Cowan <[email protected]> 2011-01-02 14:49:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> I want to clarify that the protobuf jars enable optional functionality and
> are not required (any longer) to build mkgmap - the referenced message from 
> the
> mailing list is no longer relevant as the build process was changed shortly
> after.  Now the build file will detect that the jars
> are not present and simply not build the protobuf format plugin.
> 
> Reading protobuf is not particularly useful at the current time as in most
> cases
> you will be reading files produced by the splitter program which does not
> currently write in the protobuf based format yet.
> 
> So I think that it is entirely acceptable to build without protobuf support
> until such time as the osmprotobuf jars are more easily available.

Thank you for clarifiying this. I have updated to r1760.

Spec : http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/specs/mkgmap.spec
SRPM: http://bruce89.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mkgmap-0-0.7.1760svn.fc14.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to