https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980342
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Fourdan <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Yanko Kaneti from comment #1) > Would there be a legitimate case for using the old cvt code from the X > server ? Not really - It's actually the same code. > I am assuming X upstream would be made a user of the lib. Yep, that's the plan. And even without using the lib, we could just drop cvt from the xorg-x11-server-package and make packages which need cvt (e.g. mutter has a buildReq on cvt) use the one from the lib (typically installing all of xorg-x11-server-Xorg to get only cvt to generate modelines at build time in mutter seems overkill). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
