https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976012
--- Comment #22 from Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> --- > The devel package needs to depend on the libs package now. :) ♫ 99 issues with the review request ♩ ♪ 99 things to change ♬ ♬ fix them all, submit it again ♪ ♩ 99 issues with the review request ♫ Done, same sources. > That's an interesting argument. The way I tend to look at it is that by > having the information in sync with what Meson is actually looking for, it's > less likely to fail in the future if things get reorganized. Yeah, I generally agree (I think most of my other packages now use pkgconfig) but here it's clunky. glib has a lot of .pc files so we need to check for 4 of those. pipewire has 2. but gobject-introspection-devel is still the package because WP checks for a binary, not the .pc file. So it's all a bit messy, IMO. But that's not a hill I'm willing to engage windmills in aggressive conduct on, so I've changed it to pkgconfig now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
