https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976529
--- Comment #9 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > It seems that fedora tools don't see optional dependency. It has been a few > package that act like that maybe something is wrong with the tools. fedora-review *should* complain if any of the built packages have unsatisfiable dependencies. If it doesn't, then that's a bug in fedora-review, and please report it here: https://pagure.io/FedoraReview > But that doesn't matter since it's optional right? It clearly *does* matter, or you wouldn't get a bug report for it. All package dependencies MUST be satisfiable from Fedora repositories, even "weak" dependencies (Recommends + Suggests) - though I don't remember which policy covers this. In this case, the broken dependency is only not a problem so long as no dependent package uses the "target" feature of this package. Possible solutions would be to either drop the "target" feature temporarily (if really nothing uses it), or to bump the dependency from 0.11.2 to 0.12.0, which is what's available in Fedora (assuming the package is compatible with the newer version, test this with a build with "--all-features", or run all cargo macros with the "-a" flag to test this). PS: I try to run "mock ./*.src.rpm --postinstall" to check for unsatisfiable dependencies of any built packages. It's very convenient. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
