https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981110

Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #2)
> (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1)
> > Taking this review.
> > 
> > Looks like you'll need to add something like "ExclusiveArch: x86_64 
> > aarch64".
> > The crate does not compile on other architectures, and should also not be
> > used on other architectures.
> > 
> This gonna restrict significantly the reach of dependent packages :(

It won't. Or at least, it shouldn't.
For example, looking at for example sha-1, the cpufeatures dependency is scoped
to x86_64 and aarch64, as well,
same as the cpuid-bool dependency was before it in older versions.
If the dependency is not scoped by target architecture in some crates, then
that's a bug. :)

> > Alternatively, you could do something like what was done in the
> > rust-cpuid-bool package for the same situation:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cpuid-bool/blob/rawhide/f/rust-cpuid-
> > bool.spec
> > 
> > Additionally, It would be great to use the changelog timestamp format
> > without time and timezone.
> > rust2rpm >= 18 will do that by default again.
> 
> I've reverted itt in my script, but I plqn to move to rpmautospec for all
> new and updated packages.

Works for me.

Package APPROVED


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to