https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
--- Comment #7 from Otto Urpelainen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Christopher Engelhard from comment #5) > New build. fedora-review will now probably complain about > /usr/share/php/League being also owned by other php-league-* packages. This > is expected, as discussed above. What I meant to say about this was that here's another place where fedora-review needs fixing. There is no MUST item for "Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages," it is the opposite, the guidelines explicitly allow shared ownership. Listing the shared cases is good service, so that weird situations can be spotted, but the wording is badly off. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
