https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
Lyes Saadi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |--- Status|CLOSED |POST Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #8 from Lyes Saadi <[email protected]> --- Hello :D! I would like, first of all, to thank you for reaching out to us about that font issue. At the time, I didn't reach upstream for this issue because of how big the issue was, but in retrospect, I maybe should've since you seem to be ready to address this. I am still interested in maintaining this package, and, since it already was approved, I'd be happy to maintain it in Fedora if all issues were solved, preferably with the agreement of the reviewer of this package review, Andy Mender. > Are you aware that we tidied up the pyfiglet fonts to address distribution > rights as of https://github.com/pwaller/pyfiglet/pull/61/files? I was not aware of that, and even though it certainly is a good step, it is not enough in itself, as I also need to know and document into the Fedora spec file the License of each font, unless they are licensed under the main package's license. Unfortunately, when looking at the package's history, the farthest I can go is to a zip file with no license... I have opened an issue upstream #89, so the discussion can be continued there :)! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
