https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #7 from Jarek Prokop <[email protected]> --- > I revisited it again, the rspec build-requires comes from my modified gem2rpm > fedora template. So, I take this back: no, that one should be there since that's what the test suite needs to run (at according to gemspec as well). And that is the reason for the build failure; the rubygem-rspec package is not present. I was talking about the conditional `> 3`, since Fedora does not provide rubygem-rspec <= 2, it is superfluous. > I still think that my summary/description is an improvement over the default > ones. It does descript the library better. Then I have only one small nit regarding Summary: `Upload code to gist.github.com` `Upload text to gist.github.com` Because it does not need to be code to upload it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
