https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202



--- Comment #8 from Stefan Bluhm <[email protected]> ---
> I just installed the fedora-review-plugin-java, and this issue came out.
> I think it doesn't allow you to BR javapackages-local and BR maven-local 
> instead (?)

Yepp, missed it. will be updated. Thank you.


> License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.

I think there might be misunderstanding from my side. I understood that this is
the licensing of the package and not the content. That is why I picked that
one. Should it be the license of the source files?

Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
>      xpp3-minimal

As far as I understand, minimal is a smaller version of xpp3 and can be
installed stand alone. So xpp3-minimal should not have a requirement to xpp3.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to