https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected] | |) | --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <[email protected]> --- > Ping. What's the state here? As my initially another review request was > overwhelmed with this one any progress would be nice. Packaging is clean on the packaging wide.IMO. Only usability is to be proven. See next. > The only issue remains that to translate x86 linux binaries for arm, there is > a need to install some x86 dependencies on the host. And if using fedora > packages, then there is a path clash to be expected. (as x86 and arm > libraries are using the same /usr/lib/ path). So this package looks very > complex to use on the fedora side. (unless using x86 binary with only a deps > on libc++). I only expect to build a dedicated chroot with x86 libraries and libstdc++ replaced by box86... This runtime test need to be proven for the package to be usable at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
