https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006555
--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- > 'python-autodocsumm-doc' includes a few JS libraries, originating from > sphinx-build, which have a different license and should be marked as > bundled. Hmm—this is an interesting point. It seems to make sense under a strict interpretation of the packaging rules. At the same time, this is a very typical Sphinx-generated -doc subpackage, of which there are about 600 in the distribution, and only a handful do even part of what you’ve suggested. The situation with Doxygen is similar, with nearly 400 extant packages. I’ve therefore started a discussion on the packaging mailing list (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/LLUAURXZVADATHK65HBPPBHKF4EM4UC3/) about how this should be handled in general, as changing a single package (or even every package I control) is a drop in an ocean of similar documentation packages. Still, I’m willing and able to make the changes you’ve requested. I’ll follow up with an updated submission after considering any responses on the packaging list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006555 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
