https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010999

Michael Catanzaro <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #1 from Michael Catanzaro <[email protected]> ---
This is not a full review, but a preliminary one:

Issues:
=======
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/help/C/gnome-text-editor
  But I think this is a bug in fedora-review, since this is a directory, not a
file.
  So... I think you can ignore this one.
- I think all four of the runtime Requires are unnecessary.
  These should all be handled automatically via autogenerated .so deps.
- I've never understood the directory ownership rules. Maybe we have to
  own or require other packages to own these dirs?
  Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/help/C,
  /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/services


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010999
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to