https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021429
Ben Beasley <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra | |in.net) | --- Comment #10 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- It turns out that: - pyedflib actually uses a slightly forked version of EDFlib - EDFlib upstream has decided not to support big-endian architectures I will keep the separate edflib package working on s390x, I think, but porting an edflib patch to the forked version here and testing it adequately seems tedious and perhaps error-prone. I think your best approach may be: > # Uses a forked copy of EDFlib (https://gitlab.com/Teuniz/EDFlib), which has > # elected not to support big-endian architectures. > ExcludeArch: s390x > > # Uses a forked copy of EDFlib (https://gitlab.com/Teuniz/EDFlib) > # https://github.com/holgern/pyedflib/issues/149 > # Version number: pyedflib/_extensions/c/edflib.c, EDFLIB_VERSION > Provides: bundled(edflib) = 1.17 Then after import, per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures, file an RHBZ issue blocking F-ExcludeArch-s390x with the explanation from the comment above the ExcludeArch, and replace or augment that spec file comment with a link to the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021429 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
