https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023407



--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> ---
Thanks for the review! Repository requested.

Regarding the license file—specifically, the status quo in which the license
file is marked %license by %pyproject_save_files but resides in the dist-info
directory rather than in /usr/share/licenses, and the question of whether it
should be additionally installed in /usr/share/licenses—Miro Hrončok responded
to my query on the packaging mailing list[1] agreeing that license files do not
have to be installed in /usr/share/licenses, referencing an earlier thread on
the same list[2] in which Jason L Tibbits III said he knew of no such
requirement.

Since Miro and Jason are both current FPC members, I think this is a reasonably
conclusive answer to the question of whether the additional “%license …” is
required.

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/CQX3A7LKXYODXDSR2KZOBNM2CRNN2AYS/
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/OHNVT5S4ZPOB56KAYNCWZOC6W2WAV54C/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2023407
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to