https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006765

Petr Menšík <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST



--- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <[email protected]> ---
I don't like your attitude. You refuse even simple improvements to spec file,
because it is not mandatory. Well, it is not mandatory for me as a reviewer to
give you review+. I have seriously considered just unassigning myself and
leaving such review to someone else.

You were helpful to me when I were playing with Raspberry Pi on fedora-arm
channel. I would finish the review as thanks for that. But I don't think I
requested something extra. I would not finish it for someone else. I think
rebase and sftp fedorapeople.org; mput *.spec is not too much to ask.

I think having fedpkg local --with check prepared for rebases is useful. I
would want to have it in my package, but you would maintain this package. It
would simplify basic test on a real device.

Passing the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006765
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to