https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026389
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <[email protected]> --- I think we'll leave the duplicate files as they are. They are ion channel description files, and they could change independently in each example, so they're not static doc files which are being duplicated. Linking them etc., just makes it harder to maintain the package because then for each release it may need tinkering. I'm part of upstream here, so I've filed us an issue about de-duplicating ion-channel files where possible. https://github.com/NeuralEnsemble/neurotune/issues/23 Regenerated the spec/srpm, so they should match now: Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-neurotune/python-neurotune.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-neurotune/python-neurotune-0.2.3-0.4.20211119gita17f0fd.fc36.src.rpm Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026389 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
