https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to mkulik from comment #9) > Package functions correctly after the changes. I see no more issues here. > > Package name 'autoconf27' makes sense to me if we want to keep 2.7.x version > tree. From guidelines: > The version isn't 2.7.x, it's 2.7x, which is very different. Previous autoconf versions were "autoconf213", "autoconf268", etc. as we previously didn't mandate that the version form had to match the actual version structure with a decimals. Now we do, so the correct form is "autoconf2.71". If you assume that it's getting updated versions, then you could do "autoconf2.7x". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
