https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected]) | --- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jindrich Novy from comment #2) > There is a typo in package description: > > --- > etavark is a tool for configuring networking for Linux containers. Its > features include: > --- > > rpmlint also complains that description line size is too long: > > --- > netavark.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C to work with Podman but is > also applicable for other OCI container management applications. > netavark.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C etavark is a tool for > configuring networking for Linux containers. Its features include: > netavark.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C * Creation and management of > required network interfaces, including MACVLAN networks > netavark.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C * All required firewall > configuration to perform NAT and port forwarding as required for containers > netavark.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C * Support for iptables and > firewalld at present, with support for nftables planned in a future release > --- > > it also says: > netavark.x86_64: E: useless-provides bundled(crate(nix)) > > Can you please take a look? Thanks Jindrich, those have been fixed. PTAL. (In reply to Igor Raits from comment #3) > > # Latest upstream rtnetlink frequently required > > # sha2, zbus, zvariant are currently out of date > > What about to collaborate and get them updated instead? I would love to but things are gonna keep breaking on a weekly if not daily basis and I just can't find the time for that right now. If netavark is going to be anything like podman, there would likely be a new release every week. > > > %if 0%{?fedora} > > BuildRequires: go-md2man > > %else > > BuildRequires: golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man > > %endif > > Probably BuildRequires: /usr/bin/md2man would be easier? This is just a temporary thing so I could get c9s copr builds for people that wanna test right away. It will soon be removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
