https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040728
--- Comment #8 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <[email protected]> --- > Does this matter in getting the package into fedora? If not, I will delete > the patch. It matters in the "should be reported upstream" sense, but it's not a blocker. > I prefer to not create a separate doc package as it is more work keeping two > packages in sync and moved through the process. I meant creating a sub-package. You can read more here: - https://blog.svgames.pl/article/building-multiple-packages-with-rpm - https://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-subpack.html - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch10s04.html tl;dr version is: > %package docs > Summary: Documentation for %{name} > BuildArch: noarch > > %description docs > This package contains user documentation for XTrkCad, > in HTML format. Later down the line, you just add > %files docs And list the files that should go in the "docs" subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040728 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
