Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670345 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon <[email protected]> 2011-01-18 05:29:54 EST --- Quickly reading the spec file: ># sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others (remove the unneeded one) >%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from >>distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")} >%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from >>distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")} Choose one of the other, but one should be removed > Name: cxfreeze Why did you choose this name ? I see cx_freeze more often on the website. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines > License: Python hm, seeing this http://cx-freeze.sourceforge.net/LICENSE.txt I think it might need to be reviewed to be sure the license is valid. > Source0: cx_Freeze-%{version}.tar.gz This is not correct, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > Requires: python >= 2.3 gcc Are you sure the gcc should be explicitly required ? > #add shebang > for f in ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{python_sitearch}/cx_Freeze/initscripts/* Why do you add shebang to file which will never be executed ? > #not relevant > rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{python_sitearch}/cx_Freeze/samples Why is it not relevant ? Couldn't it be provided as doc ? There are several comments on your spec which you could clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
