https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #138 from Oleg Girko <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Warren Togami from comment #137) > 1) "bitcoin-core" is not a good main package name because it looks like > "core" is a subpackage. "bitcoincore" would be a fine single word name that > matches its website bitcoincore.org. It won't look like a subpackage because it's just SRPM package name, but none of RPM packages built from it will be called "bitcoin-core". However, from aesthetic point of view, I think, it would be nicer is RPM packages would be called "bitcoin-server", "bitcoin-utils" etc. instead of "bitcoin-core-server", "bitcoin-core-utils" etc. I use similar approach in my Dash package: SRPM is called "dash-core" (to avoid a conflict with "dash" package that is a shell), but RPMS built from it are called "dash-server", "dash-utils" etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
