https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050889
--- Comment #8 from LumÃr Balhar <[email protected]> --- I'm not sure about the details here. What I think is: If you have a/b/c/d.txt and RPM explicitly owns b and d.txt I believe that there is no need to specify also ownership of c. Also, without the explicit %dir line, the package still builds fine and after its uninstallation, there are no leftovers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050889 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
