https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708
--- Comment #6 from Kaleb KEITHLEY <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5) > The plasma-* subpackages conflict with KDE software in Fedora. What should > we do here? What's your definition of conflict? someone might look at the names and mistakenly assume the libarrow plasma-* packages are part of kde, but there are no actual collisions in the names. These are the names the Apache people chose when they packaged them at https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/centos/8/x86_64/Packages/ and https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/centos/8/Source/SPackages/ (And obviously they didn't consult with Fedora or KDE when they chose them.) I have no particular attachment to any of the names they chose. They could just as easily be libarrow-plasma-* (and libarrow-parquet-*) AFAIC, apart from the fact that people who are already consuming libarrow have been using them by the names they have now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
