https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730



--- Comment #6 from Tomáš Bžatek <[email protected]> ---
So if we decide to go the split packaging way, my proposed packaging layout
might look like this:
 - python3-staslib: the core module with most of the functionality
 - nvme-stas-stafd: stafctl, stafd.service, stafd
 - nvme-stas-stacd: stacctl, stacd.service, stacd  (will require
nvme-stas-stafd)

Both the daemon packages contain minimal amount of code, not sure if this is
worth the split from maintenance perspective - any savings would be minimal. No
savings on dependencies either as most of the requirements would come from the
base python3-staslib module.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to