https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088487
--- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marián Konček from comment #7) > I indeed wanted to install the .so into /usr/lib/<name> because it is a > package-private file. Hardcoded /usr/lib/<name> is simpler to patch than > %{_libdir}/<name> whichrequires iterating over library path, appending the > package name and detecting if the file exists. Be my guest. Note that I said to install into %{_libdir}. I.e. %{_libdir}/libfoo.so. Perhaps with a symlink to it from %{_libdir}/<name>/*.so The packaging guidelines are not great on that matter, imo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088487 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
