https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Berrangé <[email protected]> --- (In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #11) > So is it OK if all the SDK files are installed under directory /usr/share? > Ex. /usr/share/intel/sgxsdk? /usr/share is for architecture independent files, so that looks inappropriate for the SDK with many native binaries. Looking at what's in the RPM currently I'd think /opt/intel/sgxsdk/SampleCode would be %{_datadir}/sgx-sdk/SampleCode, /opt/intel/sgxsdk/include would be %{_includedir}/sgx-sdk. I'm still unclear what criteria was used to choose between /opt/intel/sgx-sdk/lib and /usr/lib64 in the current RPM, but assuming there's a reason that some libs needed to be in a different dir, then /opt/intel/sgxsdk/lib likely matches to a subdir like %{_libdir}/sgx-sdk (or possibly even %{_prefix}/lib/sgx-sdk, since multilib may well be irrelevant in the context of the SDK libs). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
