https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3) > It appears you have linked a .spec file from an SRPM that was already > mangled by rpmautospec. That's usually not a good idea for a package review, > and using a preprocessed SRPM file like that will also cause creation of a > corrupted / broken .spec file when using "fedpkg import". > > > # FIXME: Upstream uses unknown SPDX tag CC-PDDC! > > Usually FIXME items should be addressed before submitting a package for > review. ;) > > In this instance, this license (CC-PDDC / Creative Commons Public Domain > Dedication and Certification) is neither considered "free" by the FSF nor is > it an OSI-approved license according its listing on the SPDX website. > > It is also not the Fedora list of "good" licenses, either (though similar > licenses are). You will need to inquire with Fedora legal whether this > license can be considered acceptable, and if it can be added to the list of > "good" licenses before this package can be imported. Isn't this actually just "Public Domain" which is on our list though? I'll start a conversation with legal - regardless of whether we go ahead with this, it might be good to clarify anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
