https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #32 from Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #11) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8) > > * The systemd-boot-unsigned and systemd-boot packages should have their efi > > architectures as suffixes, similar to shim and grub > > Hmm, but why? I don't see any guideline that'd require this, and it makes > things more complicated. Can we also make the packages noarch please, simliar to edk2? That way I can -- for example -- install the aarch64 package on a x86_64 machine and use the efi stubs when cross-compiling kernels. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
