https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129304
Benson Muite <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Benson Muite <[email protected]> --- Thanks for this. Any idea on patents? https://moodycamel.com/blog/2013/a-fast-lock-free-queue-for-c++ indicates that though the code is BSD, but that there are many patents in this area, for example https://patents.google.com/patent/US8543743B2/en I expect this only applies to the multi-producer and multi-consumer queue as it is packaged in Debian https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/readerwriterqueue Possibly consider updating the description to (remove "I" which is unclear when not in the repository, and remove external references): An original implementation of a lock-free queue designed from scratch for C++. It only supports a two-thread use case (one consuming, and one producing). The threads can't switch roles, though you could use this queue completely from a single thread if you wish (but that would sort of defeat the purpose!). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129304 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
