https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603

Otto Liljalaakso <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Otto Liljalaakso <[email protected]> ---
> Name:           nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age

According to nagios-plugins naming convention,
this should be nagios-plugins-newest_file_age.
(This comment is not review blocking.)

> BuildRequires:  make

I believe this is not needed.
If it is, ignore this comment.
You could do BuildRequires: coreutils to be explicit about having 'install',
though.
Or just BuildRequires: /usr/bin/install.

> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/nagios,
>      /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins

Please add Requires: nagios-common

> [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
>      Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
>      attached diff).
>      See: (this test has no URL)

This is just because 'fedpkg srpm', fedora-review and rpmautospec are not
compatible.
No action needed, just do not try to 'fedpkg import' that srpm.

> nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

$ rpmlint -e only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
only-non-binary-in-usr-lib:
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.

Nagios plugins directory in under /usr/lib64,
putting a shell script there is valid.
No action needed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to