https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?([email protected] | |) --- Comment #20 from Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #19) > It was really me pointing out that possibility, what you do is for upstream > to decide :-) > > I think my question is are we going to go ahead with this package right now > (with bundling), OR shall we wait for the dependencies to be built, OR shall > we wait until you split upstream into blkio + libblkio (which would mean > in turn that we're really doing two packages here and will need an extra > review)? > Let me know how you want to proceed on this one. The blkio and virtio-driver crates are being developed in libblkio.git for the time being. Changing that is not a priority, so we can work with the current layout. Bundling blkio and virtio-driver is fine by me. At some point another Rust program may be packaged by Fedora that also uses blkio or virtio-driver. At that point unbundling would be natural. Right now the only program I'm aware of that uses blkio and virtio-driver is qsd-rs (https://gitlab.com/hreitz/qsd-rs), an experimental codebase that isn't close to be packaged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
