https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303



--- Comment #4 from Sergey <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Sergey from comment #2)

> > e) Maybe worth asking upstream to soname the library?
> 
> I have asked Joseph on his versioning policy in general and he replied that 
> he has no one [0]. As 1) Joseph adds the functionality on as needed basis,
> 2) there
> are obvious bugfixes, 3) camotics builds properly with up-to-date version of
> cbang
> and 4) cbang exports c++ classes, I decided to use `version.subversion` as
> an so version,
> leaving `.revision` for bug fixes in cbang. The leading zero in `libcbang0`
> is from 
> upstream, I suspect that it is somehow related to debian packaging/naming,
> so I 
> leaved this as is. However, I will ask Joseph again about soname
> specifically. 

Done, confirmed upstream

https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/cbang/issues/103


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to