https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137159
--- Comment #10 from Mads Kiilerich <[email protected]> --- Some review-review comments: (In reply to Guido Aulisi from comment #6) > [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. If looking closely, there are some grey areas ... > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. But the general expected user experience must be that this is an update to ardour6. It *is* thus a rename. After a version upgrade, people who had ardour6 installed, should have ardour7 installed instead. And if ardour7 gets introduced next to ardour6 in existing releases, I would expect it to be "advertised" (ie installed without replacing) if ardour 6 is installed. But that is tricky to achieve. > [x]: SourceX is a working URL. (not really) > see attachment That seems to have fallen out? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137159 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
