https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119983
Frank Crawford <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(negativo17@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #18 from Frank Crawford <[email protected]> --- @[email protected] Just starting to look at the review, and most looks good, although I have a lot of items to tick off. Looking at the licensing, and while it isn't a big issue, the basic licensing is LGPL2.1 or later, and Sleepycat (c.f. BSD 4-Clause), plus a little GPL2.0 or later and BSD 3-Clause. You currently have BSD-3-Clause and LGPL-2.0-or-later and Sleepycat From the c-icap repo, it only claims LGPL-2.1, but does have files listing LGPL-2.1-or-later and the odd file that is only GPL-2.0-or-later. From BDB it is "BSD and LGPLv2 and Sleepycat", which looks to be fore SPDX "Sleepycat and BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause" (I actually can't find any LGPLv2 files in BDB!). So I think possibly the license entry should be: LGPL-2.1-or-later and GPL-2.0-or-later and (Sleepycat and BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause) However, I'll leave you to consider what you want to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119983 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
