https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121870



--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca <[email protected]> ---
> a) Should .h and .so files be in a devel package?

I don't think so, as this isn't a library meant to be linked against, the .so
is the actual program and is injected via LD_PRELOAD / ld.so path to perform
the proxying

> b) Is there an alternative package that is actively maintained? This code is 
> quite old though it seems well written and quite portable.

I haven't seen one, but I'd be open to alternatives. I'm mostly packaging this
because we still use it at work

> c) Configure script is available under Free Software License and is 
> distributed with the source tarball, but is not packaged.

Do you mean the autotools script? those are only needed during build, not on
the target system


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121870
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to