https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158678
--- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #2) > This package contains a lot of lib*.so shared libraries used by executables, > which lack soname versions [1]. They are required by packaging guidelines. > Those libraries are used at link time as a normal library, not as plugins > loaded runtime. In some cases if the .so is a plugin and not a library it's not always the cases, there are numerous examples of this. > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libcamera_app. > so > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libencoders.so > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libimages.so > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/liboutputs.so > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/ > libpost_processing_stages.so > rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libpreview.so We already have a fix posted for upstream: https://github.com/raspberrypi/libcamera-apps/pull/441 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158678 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
