https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168858
Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karolina Surma from comment #1) > Starting with question marks as I'm not familiar with arch packages. > > Fedora Review points out this one: > > - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: python3-rapidfuzz : /usr/lib64/python3.11/site- > packages/rapidfuzz/rapidfuzz.h > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_devel_packages Is this file required for the package to function? If not, it should probably not be installed (that should be fixable upstream). If it is, it needs to stay. > I don't know how to evaluate those points. > > C/C++: > [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. Unlikely. Kernel modules don't live in %{python3_sitearch}. > [ ]: Package contains no static executables. Check if the package BRs any static libraris. > [ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see > attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. If the .so file is a Python extension module in %{python3_sitearch}, this check is not relevant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168858 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
