https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166884
--- Comment #6 from Iñaki Ucar <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #5) > a) One further issue raised is: > No known owner of /usr/lib64/gfortran > > Maybe should use: > Requires: gcc-gfortran%{_isa} > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Fortran/ > #_packaging_of_fortran_programs I already do that (line 44 of the SPEC), so I don't understand this warning. I believe it's a false positive. > b) Perhaps add kernel-tools-libs-devel as a build requirement to provide > libcpupower.so and cpufreq.h I asked the upstream maintainer about this and other libraries not found. He told me that it's fine, they are not needed, they are just for some advanced upstream testing. > c) Can the documentation be build and packaged? It uses doxygen which can > generate manpages if the > doxyfile is modified slightly to turn off html documentation and turn on man > page generation. This > will add doxygen as a build requirement. The same, I asked the upstream maintainer about the docs, because doxygen HTML docs are a nightmare when it comes to the additional licenses that are included as a result of the build. He told me to ignore the docs, and that he prefers to just maintain an online version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166884 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
