https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173523
--- Comment #10 from Jan Grulich <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #8) > Issues from Fedora-review: > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/cmake/Qt6Qml, > /usr/lib64/cmake/Qt6Qml/QmlPlugins > This should be owned by qt6-qtdeclarative. I will have to fix that. > Use SPDX identifiers, need: > GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0 > > Examples are under BSD-3-Clause > Some of the code can be under GPL-2.0-only Fixed. > Documentation is under GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-only Documentation is not built and shipped. > Is it possible to add a license breakdown in the spec file? Added. Rpmlint still reports a wrong license for the Qt one, but it is listed in Fedora docs. Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/qt6-qtspeech/qt6-qtspeech.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/qt6-qtspeech/qt6-qtspeech-6.4.2-1.fc37.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173523 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
