https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174383
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> --- Using unicode-ucd is nice. We avoid having two independent version of the same dataset. I would suggest that you subscribe to notifications about unicode-ucd so that you know when to rebuild this package. + package name is OK + latest version + license is acceptable for Fedora (Apache-2.0) + license is specified correctly (SPDX) + builds and installs OK + BR/R/P look OK + rpmlint and fedora-review don't find any major issues, see below. rpmlint: > libunicode.x86_64: W: library-not-linked-against-libc > /usr/lib64/libunicode_ucd.so.0.2.0 Seems to be a false positive. > libunicode-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unicode-query As mentioned above, this is just nice-to-have. > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has > taken 1.1 s Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174383 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
