https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033



--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #3)
> It looks like this was done already, but it wasn't published to crates.io:
> https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/versionize_derive/commit/
> 55fccd6001946c47185d0d05b19fef11779ce543

Oh, perfect. :)

> The crate seems to be used nontrivially, and there are a lot of breaking
> changes: https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/releases/tag/2.0.0
> 
> Is a rust-syn1.0 package acceptable in rawhide if I backport that commit?

Look what I found: :)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-syn1

It's already stable in rawhide, and in "testing" for other branches:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-1f10607303
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6c1d08e931
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4b82d41463
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-73cf527d8d

BTW, the names for Rust compat packages are based on SemVer compatibility
guarantees, so it's rust-syn1, not rust-syn1.0.
The "rust2rpm --compat" flag I recently implemented should do "the right thing"
(TM).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to