https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184237
--- Comment #4 from Maxwell G <[email protected]> --- > The "# Ineligble for upstreaming" comment might benefit form more > rationale/reason. Although I have not seen if the commit message sin the > patches don't already do that. You can see the specfile and patches in https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/fedora-python-orjson/tree if that's easier than unpacking the SRPM. I think the messages in the patches themselves (they're git formatted patches) explain/justify the patches, but let me know if anything in particular needs to be clarified. > There is "APACHE-2.0" in the license, should have been "Apache-2.0". You're right. I've fixed it. > What is the purpose of the outmost parenthesis here? "((Apache-2.0 OR MIT) > AND BSD-3-Clause)" ? Should the License be flattened to: "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT) > AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND AND BSD-3-Clause AND Apache-2.0"? "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause" is the license of encoding_rs. I'd prefer not to preform effective licensing analysis/flattening if the License: value is still reasonable without it. --- Fix APACHE-2.0 and %changelog typos: Spec URL: https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-orjson/python-orjson.spec SRPM URL: https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-orjson/python-orjson-3.8.9-1.fc37.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184237 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
