https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439
Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |epel9 Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags|needinfo?([email protected]) | Component|Package Review |Package Review Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL --- Comment #9 from Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jindrich Novy from comment #7) > Can we start EPEL-only review Lokesh if this doesn't go to Fedora? alright. I suspect this package won't need frequent changes once setup, so fine by me. (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #8) > > But if FPC strongly feels this should be epel-only, I can live with that. > > I don't feel strongly about this (I hoped to make this clear by prefacing my > initial comment with "I'm curious"), and I didn't speak on behalf of the > FPC. I only wanted to ask, since the package looks rather unusual. ack. got it. Changed product to Fedora EPEL and version to epel9. Hope that's all we need to make this an epel package review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
