https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208350



--- Comment #8 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> ---
Spec URL:
https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fedora/rawhide/for_review/belr/belr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fedora/rawhide/for_review/belr/belr-5.2.45-1.fc39.src.rpm

> The .spec files looks good. After looking through the review.txt file, The 
> problem about license was found. Like the
> file of 
> https://gitlab.linphone.org/BC/public/belr/-/blob/master/cmake/BelrConfig.cmake.in
>  which produces BelrConfig.cmake
> file seemed to be licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later. Can you check the license 
> again?

Good catch. Also found a number of other cmake files under GPL 2, so added to
license field.

> Another question is about small CLI. I would suggest that making a 
> sub-package named `belr-tool` or `belr-tools` to include
> binary tool files of `belr-compile, belr-parse, belr_tester`.

A good idea and done, but have put as 'Recommends' to be installed as a weak
dependency by default on -devel unless a user specifically
configures their system not to install weak dependencies.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208350
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to