Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> 2011-01-31 20:35:15 EST --- ok, going down the checklist now: rpmlint: see above, ok package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok, except as noted below license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec readable: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: ok buildrequires: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: need to run /sbin/ldconfig in %post/%postun system libraries: ok, although libtb is a pretty generic name for an app-specific library relocatable: ok directory ownership: I think the -nautilus package should perhaps require nautilus, instead of owning %libdir/nautilus ? at least that's what other -nautilus subpackages do duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: ok shared lib symlinks: ok devel dep: ok libtool archives: ok desktop file: ok duplicate ownership: ok utf8 filenames: ok I don't think the-board should ship its own fonts.conf, in particular not one that contains a reference to /home/lucasr/Code... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
