https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551



--- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #21)
> Sorry, but a wrong license tag certainly is a blocking issue.

I don't see where I said that it wasn't a blocking issue. I said I was still
working on it.

> At the very least, the spec file will need to contain
> - a list of the licenses of all dependencies that get statically linked into
> shipped binaries, and
> - the resulting License tag (i.e. SPDX expression resulting from AND-ing
> them all together)
> 
> You've already included RPM macros that don't work in RHEL in the spec file
> (i.e. %cargo_license_summary and %cargo_license) - so I don't understand why
> copying the output of %cargo_license_summary from the build log into the
> spec file and AND-ing everything together to form the value of the License
> tag is an additional problem?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to