https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211180

Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail.
                   |                            |com)



--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1)
> This crate claims to be "MIT AND Apache-2.0" (why AND??), but it only
> contains a license file for Apache-2.0, but no license file for MIT ... can
> you report this upstream? This looks very weird for a small crate like this
> ... it's literally only ~100 LOC.

Ah, good catch, thanks. Filed this:
https://github.com/baoyachi/sha256-rs/issues/11

Updated spec and SRPM. Currently assuming it's still MIT AND Apache-2.0, but my
PR fixes both issues in separate commits so hopefully upstream takes both
changes.

Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/rust-sha256.spec
SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/rust-sha256-1.1.3-1.fc38.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211180

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202211180%23c2
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to